For Hearts and Souls
North Coast Calvary Chapel
Gospel For Asia
Samaritan's Purse
Billy Graham
Calvary Chapel
Syndication Info
Real Clear Politics
Hugh Hewitt
The Weekly Standard
Town Hall
American Spectator
Drudge
Newsmax
El Rushbo
CaliforniaRepublic.org
Cal Thomas
George Will
William F. Buckley
Michelle Malkin
Pave France
Add Broken Masterpieces To Your BlogRoll
My BlogRoll
Speed Channel
Champ Web
Champ Car World Series
RPM
7th Gear
Indy Star
Cart Racing
F-1
Paul Tracy
Africa
Baseball
Basketball
Books
California
California Fires
Castro's Cuba
Church and State
Clinton
Congress
Davis Recall
Diet and Exercise
Faith
Fear Mongering
Finance
For Heart and Souls
George W. Bush
Giving
Good Folks
Government Waste
Great Wisdom
Hate Speech
Humor
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Judicial Appointments
Life Issues
Marriage
Media
Media Bias
Military Issues
Misc
Music
My Opinion
My Thoughts
Other Blogs
Please Go Away
Politics
Presidential Election
Racing
Religious Persecution
Stupid Liberal Quotes
Supreme Court
Switchfoot
Taxes
Terrorism
The Passion
Voter Fraud
World Politics
Posted 11:05 AM, Pacific
"In, But Not Of" has launched a blog: www.brokenmasterpieces.com, which is clean and crisp, and center-right evangelical. Such things make book-writing worthwhile.
See the actual text here
"So, the honorable Hugh Hewitt (law degree and law professor) considers your blog, clean, crisp and center-right. Not bad for a white guy. = )" - Broken Wife after seeing Hugh's comments.
Movable Type 2.64
Credit must also be given to Power Line for the layout ideas and to Sharon of Switchboarders for letting me know of Movable Type. I'll try and be more original, later.
Beirut charges Yemeni with 'terrorism' - Lebanon has charged a Yemeni national with carrying out "terrorist acts" and masterminding a string of bomb attacks against American fast food outlets. Judicial sources in Beirut said Muammar Awwama, suspected of ties to Usama bin Ladin's ...
A Picture is worth a 1000 Words..... - Check this link by way of IranianGirl........
Bob plans 'sweeping reforms' - Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe plans to overhaul his cabinet and the central bank in an attempt to rescue the economy, state-run media has said. Mr Mugabe has said he is worried by the dominance of the black ...
Syndicated using mt-rssfeed
November 01, 2003
Stereotypes, Howard Dean Style
That is mighty compassionate of you Governor Dean. Next thing you'll want is the vote of the snake handling Christian. To you people in the south, this is what the Democratic party thinks of you. Just read what Democratic Senator from Georgia, Zell Miller, has to say.
October 30, 2003
Another Issue Gone
Looks like another Democrat hope for taking the White House is gone. I know that sounds cynical but it sounds like so many Democratic presidential candidates are rooting for bad things to happen. The economy may be one of those wishes that won't come true. Tax cuts work! These candidates that talk of raising taxes to help a struggling economy are just wrong.
October 29, 2003
Democrat Miller Endorses Bush
Freddie "The Beetle" Barnes reports on Senator Zell Miller endorsing President Bush. I think 60-70 percent of America is either at the same place as Miller or to the right of him. If people ("moderates" and "independents") would wake up to what the "mainstream" Democratic party represented then they'd only get about 30-40 percent of the popular vote. The Democratic party has totally left the mainstream.
October 18, 2003
Wesley Clark - Who Are You
This Time article will be very damaging to General Clark's bid for the Democratic nomination. So he voted for Reagan and has shown more than just patriotic support for President Bush in two instances within the last three years. This would be fine except for his drastic turn about. People on the left probably won't trust him, but if he were to win the nomination his words will come back to haunt him.
October 13, 2003
The "Department of Peace" Guy
That great leader, Dennis Kucinich, has announced he's running for President. The more face time that this guy gets on the debates, the better. I'm not quite sure which planet he's from but his grasp of reality is "far out".
Lieberman Ready To Raise Taxes
My favorite Democratic candidate for President has decided to play a bit of class warfare. Time to tax the rich, according to "Bob". Nothing like slowing down growth by raising taxes.
I also am getting a bad feeling that the Democrats will really make raising taxes on the "rich" a huge issue. It's much easier to tell a big majority of Americans that it's someone elses fault and that they are not paying "their fair share".
October 09, 2003
President Bush's Speech - 10/9/03
I saw some of President Bush's speech in New Hampshire this morning. The best part was him asking how anyone could not be glad that Saddam was removed? That is clearly a soundbite he must use often. Many of the Democrats running for President are on the wrong side of history (again) and this must be driven home. I'll post a link to the speech when I find one.
September 30, 2003
September 25, 2003
Drudge Lights Up Clark
The Drudge Report has lit up General Clark. He's got quotes of Clark praising Bush, Condi, Rummy, etc. This should play real well with the "base".
September 24, 2003
Poll Numbers
A note to President Bush.... don't look at the poll numbers. Just keep doing what is right, especially in terms of Iraq and tax cuts. There is nothing to change. One thing you can change is use the darn VETO pen on some of that spending.
General Clark's Economic Plan
CNN has the outline of General Clark's economic plan. Here are the main parts:
Of course, we get some classic Democratic demagoguery:
"Three years ago, we were told we were getting a compassionate conservative," he said. "What we got instead were massive tax cuts for the rich, staggering deficits for the country and the worst jobs losses since the Great Depression. That's not compassionate or conservative. It's heartless, reckless and it's wrong."
Now, his plan has come classic class warfare and too much spending, but to a lot of people, it will look good. In reality, all that spending is like Clinton's attempt at economic stimulus of 1993, which was just a give away to areas that supported him. That's exactly what this will end up being.
WMD Concern
I am really beginning to feel that some group of people within the administration may have exaggerated the WMD issue. I hope I'm wrong because if WMDs are not found then President Bush will love in 2004. No matter how it's spun the much of the public believes that was the main purpose for going to war. In my opinion, if the WMDs were not a cinch then it should have not been part of the reasons for going to war. The terrorism haven and murderous regime were more than enough reason to go to war. Some people really messed up and it's hurting the President a lot. President Bush must remember, the mainstream press hates him, and will pick apart every little (or big) thing. They will persist until the WMDs are found.
September 19, 2003
September 18, 2003
Clark's First Campaign Stop
General Clark had his first campaign stop in Florida. The Washington Post story is here and I will also comment on certain parts.
Clark 'Probably' Would Have Backed War
On First Campaign Stop, Democrat Lacks Specifics but Rallies Crowd
By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 19, 2003; Page A05
HOLLYWOOD, Fla., Sept. 18 -- Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark said today that he "probably" would have voted for the congressional resolution last fall authorizing war, as he charged out into the presidential campaign field with vague plans to fix the economy and the situation in Iraq.
Clark said his views on the war resemble those of Democratic Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) and John F. Kerry (Mass.), both of whom voted for the war but now question President Bush's stewardship of the Iraqi occupation. "That having been said, I was against the war as it emerged because there was no reason to start it when we did. We could have waited," Clark said during a 75-minute session with four reporters.
Trying to have it both ways. Sounds just like Kerry. Actually, Lieberman has been much for supportive of the war than Kerry. I believe Kerry only voted for the resolution for political reasons. I think Lieberman believes it's the right path, he just disagrees with the way Bush has handled the last few months. As soon as Kerry voted for the resolution, he immediately backtracked. Kerry == Clark?
En route to his first campaign stop as a candidate, a high-energy rally at a local restaurant, Clark said he has few specific policy ideas to offer voters right now and offered a few thoughts that might surprise Democrats flocking to his campaign. As recently as Sunday night, he was unsure if he should run for president, so Clark said voters need to give him time to think things through.
OK, but are you sure you want to do this?
Clark's statement on the war resolution put him at odds with former Vermont governor Howard Dean, whose stock has soared among Democratic activists in recent months on the strength of his antiwar position. It could make it difficult for Clark to differentiate himself from the other nine candidates in the field on policy, other than by touting his résumé as a former Army general and commander of NATO forces in Kosovo.
That's a pretty strong resume but the lefties won't like it. Dean is the biggest beneficiary of Clark's candidacy. Kerry might as well quit now, then he doesn't have to mingle with the common folks.
In the interview, Clark did not offer any new ideas or solutions for Iraq that other candidates have not already proposed.
I had to stop watching CNN's coverage of the war because Clark was so negative. He was one of the people who was so wrong about many parts of the war. It's real easy to be negative, General Clark. Got any solutions?
A decorated Vietnam War veteran, Clark said that if he were in Congress, he would vote against Bush's request for $87 billion for operations and reconstruction in Iraq unless the president details a specific strategy to eventually withdraw U.S. troops. Clark said he wants more troops in Iraq, but was unsure who best can provide them -- the United States, Iraqis or other countries. . He would consider cutting defense spending if elected, he said.
Clark, relaxed and chatty, portrayed himself as a different kind of Democrat, one without strong partisan impulses. He said he "probably" voted for Richard M. Nixon in 1972 and backed Ronald Reagan. He did not start considering himself a Democrat until 1992, when he backed fellow Arkansan Bill Clinton. "He moved me," Clark said. "I didn't consider it party, I considered I was voting for the man."
Someone who voted for Reagan and then Clinton a few years later really doesn't have a political philosophy. Clinton moved me (RALPH!) also.
Clark said that as recently as last week, the former president and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) both encouraged him to run, as did many of their close friends. He said the former president initially was cool to the idea but warmed to it as the draft-Clark movement grew. Clark said he never discussed running with Sen. Clinton on the same ticket, however. Clark, who discussed the vice presidency with Dean at a recent meeting, said he would not rule out taking the No. 2 slot on a ticket.
Clark said the country "will not function well" with one party controlling the White House and Congress. He sounded a bit like former presidential candidate H. Ross Perot as he talked about focusing on "context" and not specifics and his yearning to work "with people of all sides and all parts of the political spectrum."
But Clark took some shots at Bush, too. He compared Bush to Nixon in abusing his power to bully Congress and U.S. allies. "This is an administration which has moved in a way we have not seen any administration since Nixon to abuse executive authority to scheme, manipulate, intimidate and maneuver," Clark said.
Same poop, different candidate. Where is the proof? How short a memory this man has. Remember Clinton?
Still, it is domestic issues that often dominate presidential elections, and Clark remains largely undefined in this arena. He may be put to the test next week, when he is likely to participate in a Democratic debate in New York. Clark said he did not watch the last two debates.
Again, are you sure you want to do this, General Clark?
He said he supports universal health coverage that includes preventive care and a "freeze" on Bush's tax cuts that have yet to take effect for people earning $150,000 or more.
Record deficits, but wants what kind of health care coverage? Drug test for General Clark, please.
Clark said he supports a ban on assault weapons and was uncertain of precisely what the Brady gun law does -- and if any changes to it are needed. The law requires background checks and waiting periods for gun purchases.
This guy needs to read the newspaper.
"I support the Second Amendment. People like firearms, they feel secure with firearms, they should keep their firearms," said Clark, who has been shooting weapons since he was young.
We agree!!!!
Clark, who said he does not consider homosexuality a sin, said the military needs to reconsider the "don't ask, don't tell" policy for gay service members. He suggested the military should consider the "don't ask, don't misbehave" policy the British use. "It depends how you define misbehave. That's what has to be looked at," he said.
I'd expect nothing less from a Democrat.
While Clark's agenda is a work in progress, he passed one test today: he showed here he could draw a big crowd and rouse them with fiery speech. Clark flew in on a friend's private jet to shake hands here and to rally a large crowd of young and old, all shouting, "We want Clark."
While new to politics, Clark jumped up on a chair and sounded like a seasoned pro as he delivered a lively, if brief, call to arms.
"We are trapped in a jobless economy and an endless occupation" of Iraq, Clark told the crowd. "The simple truth about politics is if you are going to make a difference in the country, you have to have an organization, you have to be able to communicate the message, you have to travel, you have to have the signs, and all of that takes resources. This is America -- we operate on the greenback and I need your help."
Sorry, gotta send W. some money.
As Hugh Hewitt has said, it's still not safe to vote Democrat.
September 17, 2003
Getting It Wrong On Terrorism - Clark
Just saw an interview with General Clark. The question was how would he fight terrorism? He said he'd not focus on nations that support terrorism but would just focus on the terrorists. Sounds real backwards to me. In fact, the balance the Bush administration between states and individual terrorists is good. In fact, more emphasis needs to be placed on the states that support terrorism. Without their support the terrorists are weakened greatly.
Even More On Clark
Even though I disagree with a lot of what General Clark did as commander of NATO and some other things, I do believe it's wrong to question his military service. Honest disagreements are fine but I've already seen some conservatives go a bit far. I never served in the military, but have the highest regard for those who have. Of course, his military record like everything else is open to scrutiny but let's keep above the fray when it comes to questioning his service.
September 16, 2003
More On Clark
No matter what you may hear about General Wesley Clark (and the press will be kissing his general stars) just remember, he's a FOB (Friend of Bill). During the Clinton reign of really fouled up foreign policy, General Clark went from being a 2 star to a 4 start general before being fired by SecDef Cohen. See what The American Prowler reports. This is all just a reminder that Bill and Hillary are never going away.
General Wesley Clark
According to MSNBC, Clark is getting in. He may be a good candidate in a general election but in a Democratic primary? Too many on the left want nothing to do with the military. I just see Clark taking votes away from Lieberman or Kerry. The big winner, Howard Dean.
August 19, 2003
Go, Joe, Go
I really hope Joe Lieberman is the nominee for the Democrats. If for some reason President Bush stumbles and becomes unelectable then Senator Lieberman is OK by me. Check out this MSNBC article. The rest of the Democrats just aren't safe, in terms of national security. Lieberman understands that you don't play politics with national security.
August 11, 2003
The Washington Post Said What?
So I just picked myself up off the floor after reading this editorial from the Washington Post. If the WP is this worried about the Democratic party then things are looking pretty bad for them. As Hugh Hewitt says, "it's still not safe to vote Democrat".
August 05, 2003
The Lieberman Conundrum - from Slate
This article from slate.com laments how Joe Lieberman has a good message but has a bad messenger. It's actually too bad. I like Senator Lieberman and if a Democrat were to be President he'd be one of my top choices.
July 03, 2003
DLC Commentary
Although I think the writers completely overrate President Clinton it's a good commentary. The link is here.
June 28, 2003
The Impossible Dream?
So President Bush was in the PRC raising money and campaigning. Good. I was afraid he'd given up on us on the Left Coast. Whether Bush feels he can win in California doesn't matter. We need to replace Senator Boxer in 2004. Problem is, who the heck is running for the Republicans? I've heard Pete Wilson, BLAH! That's the ultimate, hold your nose while you vote. He would lose anyway because many evangelicals won't vote for him and I don't blame them. I don't think he can win. I like David Dreier and Christopher Cox but I doubt either will run. I wish Dennis Prager would have run.
June 27, 2003
Results of Online Poll of Democrates
Well, the Democrats had a pretty good sized online poll (moveon.org) for whom they choose. The results are here. Howard Dean was the winner and Dennis Kucinich had a good showing. Us Republicans can only say one thing, "Bring 'em on".
June 24, 2003
King Richard and other Funny Democrat Things
I hate the concept of executive orders for the President. It just seems undemocratic. Of course I wasn't surprised to hear this from Richard Gephardt:
"When I'm president, we'll do executive orders to overcome any wrong thing the Supreme Court does tomorrow or any other day."
Newsmax has the full story here, since the regular press won't cover it.
I also enjoyed seeing Senator Bahy on Hannity and Colmes telling how he believes the intelligence on WMDs and reading how Senator Rockefeller simply said "The senator is running for president".
Attack away Dems. What do they stand for anymore other that their passionate hatred of President Bush. Some of us on the right made the same mistake with President Clinton? It's not what you are against but what you are for, at least most of the time.
June 20, 2003
Howard Dean Quote From Opinion Journal
"All those countries the president insulted on his way into Iraq--they all have health insurance." - Howard Dean
Yep, let's be like Germany and France.
John Kerry and the Supremes
Senator Kerry has outlined his views on Supreme Court nominies. Here's the full article. The key phrase is here:
"I am prepared to filibuster, if necessary, any Supreme Court nominee who would turn back the clock on a woman's right to choose or the constitutional right to privacy, on civil rights and individual liberties and on the laws protecting workers and the environment," Kerry said in remarks via satellite at a meeting of Democratic party officials in St. Paul, Minn.
My interpretation, if you are against ANY limitations on abortion up to and including the 40th week of pregnancy, if you are against affirmative action, don't suck up to unions and are against saving little bugs on Farmer Fred's property then you are not qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court. Keep talking like this Senator Kerry. Great for the primaries (for you) and great for the general election (for Bush).
June 19, 2003
John Kerry Said What in 1997?
The Drudge Report strikes again. Here's some excerpts from John Kerry in 1997 pertaining to Iraq (Senate Record). Here's the link to the congressional record. That boom you hear is the backfire from Senator Kerry's campaign. It will play well in the primaries but he'll get smoked when it counts.
I don't know how long Drudge will keep the report up so I will excerpt the items from the congressional record.
"It is not possible to overstate the ominous implications for the Middle East if Saddam were to develop and successfully militarize and deploy potent biological weapons. We can all imagine the consequences. Extremely small quantities of several known biological weapons have the capability to exterminate the entire population of cities the size of Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. These could be delivered by ballistic missile, but they also could be delivered by much more pedestrian means; aerosol applicators on commercial trucks easily could suffice. If Saddam were to develop and then deploy usable atomic weapons, the same holds true." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp. S12254 -S12255)
'[Saddam Hussein] cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a matter about which there should be any debate whatsoever in the Security Council, or, certainly, in this Nation."(Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp. S12254 -S12255)
"In my judgment, the Security Council should authorize a strong U.N. military response that will materially damage, if not totally destroy, as much as possible of the suspected infrastructure for developing and manufacturing weapons of mass destruction, as well as key military command and control nodes. Saddam Hussein should pay a grave price, in a currency that he understands and values, for his unacceptable behavior. This should not be a strike consisting only of a handful of cruise missiles hitting isolated targets primarily of presumed symbolic value." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp. S12254 -S12255)
"Were its willingness to serve in these respects to diminish or vanish because of the ability of Saddam to brandish these weapons, then the ability of the United Nations or remnants of the gulf war coalition, or even the United States acting alone, to confront and halt Iraqi aggression would be gravely damaged." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp. S12254 -S12255)
"[W]hile we should always seek to take significant international actions on a multilateral rather than a unilateral basis whenever that is possible, if in the final analysis we face what we truly believe to be a grave threat to the well-being of our Nation or the entire world and it cannot be removed peacefully, we must have the courage to do what we believe is right and wise." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 11/9/97, pp. S12254 -S12255)
More On The "New" Democratic Strategy
So if there weren't any WMDs then what was the threat in late 1998 (right around impeachment time)? This is just a silly and desperate. Just remember, by not going in during the Fall of 2002 it gave the Iraqis a lot more time to hide and/or move the WMDs. We just need to keep capturing the folks from the "Most Wanted" cards. So far they've not broken but we will eventually work some plea bargains. At that time the Dems will be in deep trouble because we'll find some of the WMDs.
Again, as has been said by many folks, in a post 9/11 world it's just not safe to vote Democrat.
June 18, 2003
The Next Democratic Strategy
Based on this entry about Bob Graham and this latest by John Kerry the stategy seems to be to make Bush a liar. Two problems, Bush is a straight shooter and both of these guys had access to the same information Bush had and didn't say anything (because the info said there is WMDs). Heck, Senator Kerry even voted for the resolution allowing for the US to handle the Iraq situation.
This is truly politics at it's worst. Remember, in a post 9/11 world it's just not safe to vote Democrat.