Courtesy of RealClearPolitics.
Opinion Journal – Against Selected Enemies.
Richard Miniter tells of his great disappointment in Richard Clarke’s book. He’d interviewed Clarke many times and thought the new book would be a great look at the failures to stop 9/11. Instead it just a Bush bashing book.
Tags: Terrorism
"In, But Not Of" has launched a blog: www.brokenmasterpieces.com, which is clean and crisp, and center-right evangelical. Such things make book-writing worthwhile.
"So, the honorable Hugh Hewitt (law degree and law professor) considers your blog, clean, crisp and center-right. Not bad for a white guy. = )" - Broken Wife after seeing Hugh's comments.
© 2006–2007 Broken Masterpieces — Sitemap — Cutline by Chris Pearson
1 response so far ↓
1 Tom // Apr 1, 2004 at 8:17 pm
News item, 4/1/2004, front page of Washington Post—
“On Sept. 11, 2001, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice was scheduled to outline a Bush administration policy that would address “the threats and problems of today and the day after, not the world of yesterday” — but the focus was largely on missile defense, not terrorism from Islamic radicals…
…The White House did confirm the accuracy of excerpts given to The Post….”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42287-2004Apr1.html
So I’m sorry, I was reading the White House-confirmed news article on Condi’s never-given 9/11/01 speech…What did this article by Miniter say about Clarke?