What advocates of same-gender unions don’t seem to realize is that if gender is negotiable, then so is the number. Why stop at two? Why not have 3, 5, or 25 people enter into a “marriage” so that everyone involved can benefit by our current laws?
What advocates of same-gender unions don’t seem to realize is that if gender is negotiable, then so is the number. Why stop at two? Why not have 3, 5, or 25 people enter into a “marriage” so that everyone involved can benefit by our current laws?
Tags: Marriage
Tags: Marriage